Brandon Bach
Not an incumbent. No voting record. Their campaign website · Their Citizens Count profile
This score comes from Brandon Bach’s own campaign website, not from votes and not from a questionnaire. Brandon Bach returned no answers at all to the Citizens Count survey, so the positions below were read off the platform they published themselves, on brandonbach.com. Every one of them quotes the sentence it came from. That is weaker evidence than a survey answer. A campaign site is written to persuade, not to answer a set question, and it is silent on most of this ballot. The scorecard scores votes.
By issue area
- Defend the Public School MonopolyFrom the Freedom To Flourish section of the DSA program0%0/1
Every answer that counted (1)
The question wording is Citizens Count’s. The “aligned answer” column is the answer a DSA-aligned candidate would give, taken from the plank named beside it. Brandon Bach never answered these questions. Each row below quotes what they published on their own site and says why it answers the question. If reaching an answer took any reasoning at all, the row is not here, it is further down and it does not count.
| Question | Read as | Aligned answer | Counted as |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Education Freedom Account" programDo you support the “Education Freedom Account” program, which gives students access to the per-pupil share of state school funding to spend on private school or home school expenses?Defend the Public School Monopoly · Freedom To Flourish“She supports policies that protect parental rights, expand educational freedom, and let funding follow the student - whether a family chooses public school, charter, private, homeschool, or microschooling.”The survey describes the Education Freedom Account programme as giving students the per-pupil share of state school funding to spend on private or home school expenses. "Let funding follow the student ... private, homeschool" is that programme, named by its mechanism. | For | Against | Not aligned |
Read, and deliberately not counted (1)
Brandon Bach's site touches these questions without settling them. Getting from what they wrote to a For or an Against takes a chain of reasoning, and a chain of reasoning is not a position somebody took. None of these are in the score. They are printed so the reader can check the line we drew, instead of taking on trust that one was drawn at all.
- Majority of public school funding through local property taxesUnsettled, not counted
“Brandon will support controlling spending, reducing unfunded mandates from Concord, and returning decision-making authority to local communities.”
Cuts both ways on the question actually asked. Fewer mandates from Concord points away from the current state-and-local split; returning decisions to towns points towards keeping schools locally funded. The page does not settle it. Not counted.
Their site says nothing about these (9)
Brandon Bach’s website never raises these. Silence is silence. It is not an “Undecided”, and it is not evidence of anything. None of these counted against Brandon Bach.
- Broad-based income taxNot addressed
- Interest and Dividends taxNot addressed
- Business tax decreaseNot addressed
- Fund the Office of the Child AdvocateNot addressed
- School district tax cap mandateNot addressed
- Public school open enrollment with limitsNot addressed
- Expand net metering opportunitiesNot addressed
- Allow segregation based on biological sexNot addressed
- Proof of citizenship for newly registered votersNot addressed
Photo via Brandon Bach’s Citizens Count profile.
All 203 scored candidates · Check every quote against brandonbach.com · read September 11, 2026
Share this rating
The grade, the score and what it is made of, as a picture sized for where it is going. Pasting this page’s address into a post shows the link preview on its own.
Granite Solutions rating, from positions published on the candidate's own campaign website. Not a DSA endorsement. Methodology